Thursday, July 27, 2006
Capital Punishment
The ACLU of Montana has itself all in a snit about Capital Punishment. There is some feeling among them that if a man is to be put to death it ought to be “humane”. They seem to be saying that there is no proof that the criminal does not feel pain before death occurs. That, in some way, the barbiturate which is supposed to deaden pain is not sufficient and is not administered by someone qualified in medicine. The case in point at this time is that of a man who has been on death row for many years and has given up the battle to delay his execution further. I say, “Let him die.” I asked a medical friend who is a member of ACLU the other day about their position and he said in effect that he was not a part of that action. My point is that the ACLU doesn’t seem to take into consideration the suffering the murderer placed on the three he killed and the continued pain to those who survive. Maybe leathel injection is to kind for a guy like this. Even Saddam has asked for the firing squad.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

5 comments:
It does seem to be splitting hairs or something. I mean if execution is the penalty, which is debatable as a subject itself, but if it is to be done in the name of the state, lethal injection does seem more humane than drawing and quartering, pressing to death or any number of execution methods whose purpose was to inflict pain. The state is doing its best to be humane within the current methods availible.
Given the "quality" of life on death row keeping them alive can be more cruel
Killing someone is never humane. Death is death. Legal, moral, ethical? I still have unsettled ideas. However, "capital punishment" is never humane.
And neither is murder!
I agree. Capital punishment--right or not--can never be humane. Quick, less painful, less sensational, but never humane.
Post a Comment